Intended for healthcare professionals

  1. Effects of preventive...
  2. Effects of preventive home visits to elderly people living in the community: systematic review
General Practice

Effects of preventive home visits to elderly people living in the community: systematic review

BMJ 2000; 320 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7237.754 (Published 18 March 2000) Cite this as: BMJ 2000;320:754

Data supplement


  •  
     
     
      Trials of preventive home visits
       
    Study (country)
    Intervention
    Carpenter et al9 (UK)
    Volunteers completed a scored activity of daily living questionnaire. Individuals with an increase in score >5 were referred to their general practitioner. Subjects with no disability were visited every 6 months, and those with some or severe disability every 3 months for a period of about 3 years. Controls received regular care
    Main objective: reducing medical, functional, mental, and social/environmental problems
    Fabacher et al11 (USA)
    A home visit by a physician’s assistant or nurse to screen for medical, functional, and psychosocial problems, followed by a letter describing findings and recommendations, and follow up visits by trained volunteers at 4 month intervals for 1 year Controls received only telephone interviews at 4 month intervals to collect outcome data
    Main objective: improving health and functional status
    Hall et al13 (Canada)
    The intervention and control group all received standard long term care services, which included screening and preadmission assessment, arrangement or purchase of needed services and review at 3 months and at least yearly thereafter. In addition the intervention group received visits from the project nurse, who helped each subject to devise a personal health plan based on his or her needs in the areas of health care, substance use, exercise, nutrition, stress management, emotional functioning, social support and participation, housing, finances, and transportation. The frequency of visits to individual clients depended on their needs (duration 3 years)
    Main objective: assisting older adults in maintaining their total “wellbeing”
    Hendriksen et al15 (Denmark)
    An interview was carried out by a nurse using a structured questionnaire, and information on social and health conditions was collected. Corresponding visits were made every 3 months throughout the study (maximum 12 visits during a period of 3 years)
    Controls received regular care

    Main objective: reduction of mortality, and medical consumption

    Luker17 (UK)
    The intervention group received focused health visitor intervention once monthly for 4 months from a health visitor. The focus of the visits was generated by the subject’s health problems, which are subsumed under 10 headings: weight maintenance, mobility, dentition, sensory function, elimination, loneliness, performance of personal or household tasks, rest, medication, miscellaneous
    Controls received regular care

    Main objective: improving health problems and life satisfaction

    McEwan et al18 (UK)
    The test group received a home visit from a nurse at which an assessment lasting 45 minutes was made of: activities of daily living, social functioning, sensory function, mental and emotional problems, current medical problems, blood pressure, urinalysis, haemoglobin concentration, and compliance with medication
    Controls received regular care

    Main objective: resolving health and related problems and improving quality of life

    Pathy et al19 (UK)
    A screening questionnaire was sent to the participants. Depending on the answers and other information, the health visitor would arrange home visits and give any practical advice and health education that might be needed or arrange referral to the general practitioner or community service. The duration of the intervention period was 3 years
    Controls received regular care

    Main objective: improving quality of life and health status, and reducing mortality and use of all services

    van Rossum et al23 (Netherlands)
    The intervention group was visited four times a year over a period of 3 years, with extra visits if necessary by a public health nurse. The nurse discussed health topics in a broad sense with the participants and gave information and advice
    Controls received regular care

    Main objective: improving the state of health (functional and mental state, wellbeing, and mortality)

    Sorensen and Sivertsen25 (Denmark)
    During a home visit a social worker assessed housing conditions, economy, social support, and social network. In addition the need for health intervention was estimated by a physician, based on a general medical examination. Those found to need further treatment were referred to their general practitioner
    Controls received regular care

    Main objective: relieving unmet medical and social needs

    Stuck et al26 (USA)
    The people in the intervention group were seen at home by gerontologic nurse practitioners who, in collaboration with geriatricians, evaluated problems and risk factors for disability, gave specific recommendations, and provided health education. During a period of 3 years, follow up visits were performed every 3 months
    Controls received regular care

    Main objective: preventing disability

    Tinetti et al29 (USA)
    After a baseline assessment in their homes by the study nurse practitioner and physical therapist, based on the results of the assessment the subjects received the following interventions: behavioural recommendations, education about use of sedative-hypnotic agents, training in transfer skills, changes in environmental hazards, gait training, balance exercises, etc. The intervention phase lasted 3 months after the baseline assessment
    Controls received regular care plus social visits

    Main objective: reducing the risk of falling

    Vetter et al31 (Gwent and Powys, UK)
    Subjects were visited at home by a health visitor. The health visitors were instructed to interview patients and to keep notes according to usual health visiting practice. The health visitors were restricted to making one unsolicited visit a year (for a period of 2 years). They followed up patients who were in trouble at that visit
    Controls received regular care

    Main objective: improving wellbeing and physical, mental, and social functioning

    Vetter et al32 (UK)
    During a period of 4 years a health visitor visits the household at least once a year, for those not presenting any problems. Those elderly people who had problems were visited as often as was thought necessary by the health visitor. The health visitor first obtained a history of illness and than concentrated on four factors: nutrition, medical conditions, environment, and assessment and improvement of general muscle tone and fitness
    Controls received regular care

    Main objective: reducing the number of fractures

    Wagner et al33 (USA)
    Intervention 1: subjects received a visit from a specially trained nurse or educator, aimed at reviewing risk factors for disability and falls. This resulted in a tailored intervention plan to address identified risk factors and motivate seniors to increase physical and social activity
    Intervention 2: a nurse visit focused on assessments and counselling relevant to prevention of cardiovascular disease, detection of breast and cervical cancer, influenza vaccination, and seat belt use

    Controls received regular care

    Main objective: reducing days of restricted activity due to illness

Related articles

See more

Cited by...

  • Understanding the impact of delegated home visiting services accessed via general practice by community-dwelling patients: a realist review protocol
  • Proceed with caution
  • Effectiveness of interdisciplinary primary care approach to reduce disability in community dwelling frail older people: cluster randomised controlled trial
  • Retour vers le futur: soins primaires a domicile pour les Canadiens ages confines a la maison: Partie 1: ou nous en sommes
  • Back to the future: home-based primary care for older homebound Canadians: Part 1: where we are now
  • Home visits for frail older people: a qualitative study on the needs and preferences of frail older people and their informal caregivers
  • Effect of preventive primary care outreach on health related quality of life among older adults at risk of functional decline: randomised controlled trial
  • Effectiveness of acute geriatric units on functional decline, living at home, and case fatality among older patients admitted to hospital for acute medical disorders: meta-analysis
  • Lignes directrices de pratique clinique 2002 pour le diagnostic et le traitement de l'osteoporose au Canada
  • 2002 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada
  • Review: home visiting with multidimensional assessment and multiple visits reduces nursing home admissions in low risk elderly people
  • Randomised comparison of three methods of administering a screening questionnaire to elderly people: findings from the MRC trial of the assessment and management of older people in the community
  • Preventive home visits to elderly people
  • Effectiveness of home based support for older people: systematic review and meta-analysis Commentary: When, where, and why do preventive home visits work?
  • Effects of a programme of multifactorial home visits on falls and mobility impairments in elderly people at risk: randomised controlled trial
  • Review: evidence is unclear that preventive home visits for elderly people in the community improve mortality or health outcomes
  • Preventive home visits to elderly people in the community
Back to top