Intended for healthcare professionals

  1. Education
  2. Atraumatic (pencil...
  3. Atraumatic (pencil-point) versus conventional needles for lumbar puncture: a clinical practice guideline
CCBYNC Open access
Practice Rapid Recommendations

Atraumatic (pencil-point) versus conventional needles for lumbar puncture: a clinical practice guideline

BMJ 2018; 361 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k1920 (Published 22 May 2018) Cite this as: BMJ 2018;361:k1920

Population

Patients with any indication for lumbar puncture Diagnosis Anaesthesia Myelography Not applicable to patients only undergoing epidural puncture

Comparison 1

or Conventional needle Atraumatic needle Lumbar puncture with any atraumatic (pencil point) needle Lumbar puncture with any conventional needle Conventional needle Atraumatic needle

We recommend the use of atraumatic over conventional needles Click fordetails Strong Benefits outweigh harms for almost everyone. All or nearly all informed patients would likely want this option. Weak Benefits outweigh harms for the majority, but not for everyone. The majority of patients would likely want this option. Weak Benefits outweigh harms for the majority, but not for everyone. The majority of patients would likely want this option. Strong Benefits outweigh harms for almost everyone. All or nearly all informed patients would likely want this option.

Comparison of benefits and harms

Favours conventional needle Favours atraumatic needle Evidence quality Events per 1000 people No important difference The panel found that these differences were not important for most patients, because the intervention effects were negligible and/or very imprecise (such as statistically not significant)

59 fewer Postdural puncture headache High More 39 98

Risk of Bias No serious concerns Imprecision No serious concerns Indirectness No serious concerns Inconsistency No serious concerns Publication bias No serious concerns Use of atraumatic needles decreases the risk of postdural puncture headache Within five days of lumbar puncture

Need for epidural blood patch High More 24 12 fewer 12

Risk of Bias No serious concerns Imprecision No serious concerns Indirectness No serious concerns Inconsistency No serious concerns Publication bias No serious concerns Use of atraumatic needles decreases the probability of returning to hospital to receive an epidural blood patch

7 fewer Backache High More 159 166 No important difference

Risk of Bias No serious concerns Imprecision No serious concerns Indirectness No serious concerns Inconsistency No serious concerns Publication bias No serious concerns Use of atraumatic needles has little or no effect on the risk of backache Maximal follow up 2 days – 3 weeks

40 fewer Hearing disturbance High More 13 53

Risk of Bias No serious concerns Imprecision No serious concerns Indirectness No serious concerns Inconsistency No serious concerns Publication bias No serious concerns Use of atraumatic needles decreases the risk of hearing disturbance Maximal follow up 2 days – 3 weeks

37 fewer Nerve root irritation Moderate More 89 126

Risk of Bias No serious concerns Imprecision No serious concerns Indirectness Serious Inconsistency No serious concerns Publication bias No serious concerns Use of atraumatic needles decreases the risk of nerve root irritation Maximal follow up 2 days – 3 weeks

22 fewer Hospital for fluids or analgesia High More 17 39

Risk of Bias No serious concerns Imprecision No serious concerns Indirectness No serious concerns Inconsistency No serious concerns Publication bias No serious concerns Use of atraumatic needles decreases the probability of returning to hospital for intravenous fluids or controlled analgesia Maximal follow up 2 days – 3 weeks

Failed lumbar puncture High More 33 38 No important difference

Risk of Bias No serious concerns Imprecision No serious concerns Indirectness No serious concerns Inconsistency No serious concerns Publication bias No serious concerns Use of atraumatic needles has little or no impact on the risk of failed lumbar puncture Immediate
See all outcomes
The panel believes patients will put a high value attributed to the large reduction in symptoms that they may suffer following the procedure. Given the lack of harms from atraumatic needles, most patients are likely to choose this option Preferences and values While atraumatic and conventional needles are reported to be similar to use, some learning may be required for clinicians to use the new types of needle Training and use Subgroups There are no differences in the effects of atraumatic versus conventional needles between subgroups defined by: Key practical issues Patient age Prescription or use of prophylactic measures Position of the patient during the lumbar puncture Clinical specialty of the individual performing procedure The indication for the procedure Use of bed rest after the procedure Patient sex Needle gauge Atraumatic needles do not eliminate the risk of complications entirely and clinicians should continue to discuss potential adverse consequences of the lumbar puncture with their patients

©BMJ Publishing Group Limited.

Disclaimer: This infographic is not a validated clinical decision aid. This information is provided without any representations, conditions or warranties that it is accurate or up to date. BMJ and its licensors assume no responsibility for any aspect of treatment administered with the aid of this information. Any reliance placed on this information is strictly at the user's own risk. For the full disclaimer wording see BMJ's terms and conditions: https://www.bmj.com/company/legal-information/

Find recommendations, evidence summaries and consultation decision aids for use in your practice

Partnership in practice

Illuminating the patient experience of lumbar puncture

Article usage

Article metrics provide readers and authors with an indication of how often a specific article has been accessed month by month. It counts three formats - abstract/extract, full text and pdf. The page is updated each day.

Usage statistics: May 2018 to May 2025

Rendering graph...
AbstractFullPdf
May 201869173340
Jun 2018263627567
Jul 201851417766
Aug 2018231611077
Sep 2018135073
Oct 20181563220
Nov 2018044573
Dec 2018264759
Jan 2019370095
Feb 2019042668
Mar 20191393125
Apr 20192376113
May 20191388115
Jun 20192292104
Jul 20192637131
Aug 20192427109
Oct 20190501103
Nov 20195577108
Dec 2019047575
Jan 20208702115
Feb 2020057995
Mar 2020248292
May 2020054847
Jun 2020236757
Jul 2020050854
Aug 2020338357
Sep 2020159078
Oct 2020255749
Nov 2020258961
Dec 2020662362
Jan 2021358758
Feb 2021544565
Mar 2021558582
Apr 2021448452
May 2021465065
Jun 2021242937
Jul 2021348049
Aug 2021339547
Sep 2021142959
Oct 2021449877
Nov 20213487120
Dec 20211046456
Jan 2022260761
Feb 2022166879
Mar 2022468373
Apr 20223640105
May 2022167067
Jun 2022450462
Jul 2022044448
Aug 2022154087
Sep 2022368974
Oct 2022065692
Nov 2022062972
Dec 2022037949
Jan 2023154546
Feb 2023061656
Mar 2023064085
Apr 2023150662
May 2023266679
Jun 2023071865
Jul 2023065555
Aug 2023171679
Sep 2023070581
Oct 2023089382
Nov 2023075073
Dec 2023164247
Jan 2024087871
Feb 2024482873
Mar 2024360169
Apr 2024064672
May 2024169272
Jun 2024259474
Jul 2024168177
Aug 2024369161
Sep 2024068071
Oct 2024082181
Nov 2024188853
Dec 2024059260
Jan 2025163169
Feb 2025164741
Mar 2025162865
Apr 2025389081
May 2025843744
Total188634228668
Back to top