Intended for healthcare professionals

  1. News & Views
  2. A modest proposal on...
  3. A modest proposal on gun control—and a real one
Observations Yankee Doodling

A modest proposal on gun control—and a real one

BMJ 2016; 352 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i69 (Published 06 January 2016) Cite this as: BMJ 2016;352:i69

All rapid responses

Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed. Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles. The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being wilfully misrepresented as published articles or when it is brought to our attention that a response spreads misinformation.

From March 2022, the word limit for rapid responses will be 600 words not including references and author details. We will no longer post responses that exceed this limit.

The word limit for letters selected from posted responses remains 300 words.

Re: A modest proposal on gun control—and a real one

Douglas Kamerow's article demonstrates some worthwhile (perhaps unconventional) analysis. US gun law is an example of circumstances advancing beyond appropriate (well intended) legislation, and could be compared with the current issues of policing the internet. In 1776, the Right to Bear Arms meant a single shot, muzzle-loading pistol or musket. Perhaps a constitutional amendment to specify these weapons (instead of accepting the right to own any derivatives) might resolve current issues!

Competing interests: No competing interests

01 February 2016
Vernon H Needham
Freelance GP
Andover

Re: A modest proposal on gun control—and a real one

Guns for civilians should be actually banned completely. Instead of guns, non-lethal alternatives such as stun guns, tasers, and pepper sprays should be encouraged.

Competing interests: No competing interests

09 January 2016
Vagish Kumar L Shanbhag
Reader
Department of Oral medicine and radiology, Yenepoya Dental College and Hospital*, Yenepoya Research Centre*, Yenepoya University
University Road, Deralakatte, Mangalore-575018
Back to top