Assisted dying: legal ambiguity lets down families as well as patients
BMJ 2015; 351 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h4453 (Published 19 August 2015) Cite this as: BMJ 2015;351:h4453- Colin Brewer, writer, researcher, and former psychiatrist, London, UK
- brewerismo{at}gmail.com
I saw some horrible deaths as a student that even modern palliative care would not have palliated much. Later, I was active in the pressure group the Voluntary Euthanasia Society (now called Dignity in Dying). And, in the past few years, I have done several psychiatric assessments of people who wanted to go to Switzerland to die in their own time rather than in God’s.
Many doctors fear that, if they write reports for patients who are planning an assisted death (I prefer “medically assisted rational suicide”1), they risk a General Medical Council hearing or even a criminal charge for assisting suicide. The defence societies urge extreme caution. Not being on the medical register means that, although I am qualified to write such reports, I can ignore …
Log in
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £184 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£50 / $60/ €56 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.