Investigating sepsis with biomarkers
BMJ 2015; 350 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h254 (Published 28 January 2015) Cite this as: BMJ 2015;350:h254- Anthony S McLean, professor of intensive care medicine1,
- Benjamin Tang, associate professor of intensive care medicine1,
- Stephen J Huang, associate professor and principal research fellow, intensive care medicine12
- 1Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- 2Nepean Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Correspondence to: A S McLean Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Nepean Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney NSW, Australia anthony.mclean{at}sydney.edu.au
The bottom line
The diagnosis of sepsis is a challenge, and the causative pathogen is not always identified
Clinical assessment remains the mainstay of diagnosis of sepsis, with tests such as white cell count, C reactive protein, lactate, and procalcitonin being adjunctive
Biomarkers such as lactate and procalcitonin have only moderate diagnostic performance and are also raised in non-infectious conditions
A 65 year old man presents with lethargy, fever, and rigors. On examination his arterial blood pressure is 120/50 mm Hg, he has a mild tachycardia (105 beats/min), and he is febrile (38.7°C), with no other abnormalities. His urine is cloudy and urinary dipstick test shows the presence of leucocytes and nitrate. There is no history of recent travel, urinary symptoms, or drug allergy (including antibiotic sensitivity) and no relevant findings on systems review (such as liver or kidney disease). You promptly establish intravenous access, draw blood for laboratory tests (including blood culture), send a urine sample for microbiology, and administer the first dose of an empirical broad spectrum antibiotic.
These clinical signs and symptoms strongly suggest sepsis. However, in a third of patients with sepsis, the causative pathogen cannot be identified.1 The lack of confirmatory evidence of infection often makes the diagnosis of sepsis a challenge. This difficulty is reflected by the inclusion of the words “probable infection” in defining sepsis in the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines (box 1).2
Box 1: Definitions and classification of sepsis syndrome2
Systemic inflammatory response syndrome
An abnormal increase in two or more of the following parameters:
White …
Log in
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £184 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£50 / $60/ €56 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.