Letters
New UK law on consent
Clarifying the Montgomery judgment
BMJ 2015; 350 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h2217 (Published 28 April 2015) Cite this as: BMJ 2015;350:h2217- Caroline Fryar, MDU head of advisory services1
- 1MDU Services, One Canada Square, London E14 5GS, UK
- media{at}themdu.com
Many doctors have questioned the implications of the recent Supreme Court judgment of Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board on the way they obtain a patient’s consent.1 2
When discussing benefits and risks of treatment, the new ruling requires doctors to consider whether “a reasonable person in the patient’s position would be likely to attach significance to the risk, or the doctor …
Log in
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £184 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£50 / $60/ €56 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.