Screening tests for tuberculosis before starting biological therapy
BMJ 2015; 350 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h1060 (Published 05 March 2015) Cite this as: BMJ 2015;350:h1060
All rapid responses
Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed. Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles. The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being wilfully misrepresented as published articles or when it is brought to our attention that a response spreads misinformation.
From March 2022, the word limit for rapid responses will be 600 words not including references and author details. We will no longer post responses that exceed this limit.
The word limit for letters selected from posted responses remains 300 words.
Dr Hewitt and colleagues have been kind enough to produce a lucid paper.
May I request them to elaborate a few points:
1. What skin tests do they recommend (Heaf, the Tine, the Mantoux, or any others?
2. How do they interpret the reactions?
3. They mention that the patient was " white" and locally born. Had she always lived in a low TB "community"?
Thank you
Competing interests: No competing interests
Dear Editor,
We read with interest the article by Hewitt et al., ‘Screening tests for tuberculosis before starting biological therapy’.[1] We agree with the authors’ conclusion that a combination of an interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) [either QuantiFERON-TB Gold in-Tube (QFT-IT) or TSPOT.TB assay] and a tuberculin skin test (TST) is the most sensitive approach to screening for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in patients with a rheumatological disease prior to starting biological therapies.
Hewitt et al. highlight the fact that patients receiving corticosteroids can have false-negative TST results. However, it is important to emphasise that IGRAs, which are designed primarily to achieve high specificity (rather than high sensitivity), are also prone to false-negative results in this setting.
Although a recent meta-analysis found no statistically significant reduction in positive IGRA results in patients on corticosteroids, this does not constitute evidence for ‘no effect’.[2] Importantly, only nine studies were included in this particular subgroup analysis, and there was significant heterogeneity between those studies.
QFT-IT assays rely on the detection of interferon-gamma responses induced by stimulation of blood with TB-specific antigens and can produce either ‘determinate’ (ie positive or negative) or ‘indeterminate’ results.[3] The latter occur when the IFN-gamma concentration in the nil (negative) control sample exceeds a pre-defined threshold, or the IFN-gammaγ response in the mitogen (positive) control sample is insufficient. In our recently published ex vivo study, we found that therapeutic levels of dexamethasone significantly reduce TB antigen-induced IFN-gammaγresponses in the QFT-IT assay, without causing a significant reduction in positive control responses (ie without resulting in ‘indeterminate’ assay results).[4]. Our results show that patients on corticosteroids are at increased risk of false-negative QFT-IT results. Moreover, they highlight that a ‘determinate’ result (due to a sufficient positive control response) in this situation does not provide reassurance that a low or absent IFN-γ response to TB antigens represents absence of LTBI. These data are consistent with Belard et al.’s finding that prednisolone significantly reduces QFT-IT performance in patients screened for LTBI prior to biological therapy.[5]
Interestingly, we found that a different cytokine, IFN-gamma inducible protein 10 (IP-10), was a more sensitive marker of LTBI in TB antigen-stimulated assays in the presence of dexamethasone.[4] This is consistent with a recent study in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving corticosteroids and/or biological therapies, which also found that TB antigen-induced IP-10 responses have greater sensitivity than IFN-gamma responses in this setting.[6]
Until more robust and more accurate immune-based tests for TB become available, we strongly endorse Hewitt et al.’s recommendation that a combination of both TST and IGRA should be used to determine the TB infection status of immunosuppressed patients, whilst remaining vigilant to the fact that even this cautious approach cannot definitively exclude the presence of LTBI in this group of patients.
References
1. Hewitt RJ, Francis M, Singanayagam A, et al. Screening tests for tuberculosis before starting biological therapy. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) 2015;350:h1060.
2. Ruan Q, Zhang S, Ai J, et al. Screening of latent tuberculosis infection by interferon-gamma release assays in rheumatic patients: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rheumatol 2014. doi: 10.1007/s10067-014-2817-6.
3. Tebruegge M, de Graaf H, Sukhtankar P, et al. Extremes of age are associated with indeterminate QuantiFERON-TB gold assay results. J Clin Microbiol 2014;52(7):2694-7.
4. Clifford V, Zufferey C, Germano S, et al. The impact of anti-tuberculous antibiotics and corticosteroids on cytokine production in QuantiFERON-TB Gold In Tube assays. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2015.02.039.
5. Belard E, Semb S, Ruhwald M, et al. Prednisolone treatment affects the performance of the QuantiFERON gold in-tube test and the tuberculin skin test in patients with autoimmune disorders screened for latent tuberculosis infection. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2011;17(11):2340-9.
6. Chen DY, Shen GH, Chen YM, et al. Interferon-inducible protein-10 as a marker to detect latent and active tuberculosis in rheumatoid arthritis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2011;15(2):192-200.
Competing interests: No competing interests
Re: Screening tests for tuberculosis before starting biological therapy
Dear editor,
We thank Dr Clifford and colleagues for their insightful and useful correspondence (1) on the merits of a dual testing approach with a combination of an interferon gamma release assay (IGRA) in combination with a tuberculin skin test(TST). Their additional data in an ex-vivo model indicating that dexamethasone suppresses TB antigen interferon gamma responses and not the mitogen control response adds further strength to the clinical merits for considering a 'dual testing' approach.
The use of Interferon gamma inducible protein 10 (IP-10) rather than just interferon gamma alone as a potential marker for future assays has already been of some interest (2) and clinical studies are needed to further validate it's clinical utility.
We agree that continued vigilance is required despite negative testing with both modalities given the current limitations of either test in the setting of inflammatory disease and immunomodulation.
1) Correspondence ref
2) Jeong YH, Hur YG, Lee H, Kim S et al. Discrimination between active and latent tuberculosis based on ratio of antigen-specific to mitogen-induced IP-10 production. J Clin Microbiol. 2015 Feb;53(2):504-10.
Competing interests: No competing interests