Endgames Statistical Question Parametric statistical tests for two related groups: numerical data BMJ 2014; 348 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g124 (Published 10 January 2014) Cite this as: BMJ 2014;348:g124 Article Related content Metrics Responses Peer review Related articles Endgames Confounding in clinical trials Published: 23 November 2012; BMJ 345 doi:10.1136/bmj.e7951 Endgames Log transformation of data Published: 08 October 2012; BMJ 345 doi:10.1136/bmj.e6727 Endgames Parametric v non-parametric statistical tests Published: 14 March 2012; BMJ 344 doi:10.1136/bmj.e1753 Endgames Statistical hypothesis testing Published: 21 April 2010; BMJ 340 doi:10.1136/bmj.c2059 Endgames Independent samples t test Published: 02 June 2010; BMJ 340 doi:10.1136/bmj.c2673 Endgames A comparison of parametric and non-parametric statistical tests Published: 17 April 2015; BMJ 350 doi:10.1136/bmj.h2053 See more Units of sampling, observation, and analysis BMJ October 09, 2015, 351 h5396; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h5396 Randomised controlled trials: understanding confounding BMJ September 25, 2015, 351 h5119; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h5119 Understanding the ecological fallacy BMJ September 21, 2015, 351 h4773; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h4773 How to read a funnel plot in a meta-analysis BMJ September 16, 2015, 351 h4718; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h4718 Understanding the Hawthorne effect BMJ September 04, 2015, 351 h4672; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h4672 Cited by... A comparison of parametric and non-parametric statistical testsFulltext PDF Randomised controlled trials: "within subject" versus "between subject" designsFulltext PDF
