Intended for healthcare professionals

  1. News & Views
  2. Implausible results in...
  3. Implausible results in human nutrition research
Editorials

Implausible results in human nutrition research

BMJ 2013; 347 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f6698 (Published 14 November 2013) Cite this as: BMJ 2013;347:f6698

Related articles

See more

Cited by...

  • Methodological quality of research on perioperative immunomodulatory supplementation in oncological gastrointestinal tract surgery: a meta-research protocol
  • Early-life diet and risk of inflammatory bowel disease: a pooled study in two Scandinavian birth cohorts
  • Need for a nutrition-specific scientific paradigm for research quality improvement
  • Comparison of seven popular structured dietary programmes and risk of mortality and major cardiovascular events in patients at increased cardiovascular risk: systematic review and network meta-analysis
  • Stricter protocols combined with a clinical serum biomarker can increase replicability and causality for dietary intervention studies. Plus empirical data on BPA regrettable substitutions
  • Colorectal cancer and absolute risks
  • Artificial intelligence analytics applied to body mass index global burden of disease worldwide cohort data derives a multiple regression formula with population attributable fraction risk factor coefficients testable by all nine Bradford Hill causality criteria
  • Colorectal cancer and absolute risks
  • Demographic, spatial, and temporal dietary intake patterns among 526,774 23andMe research participants
  • Investigating hsCRP as a clinical inflammation marker for human Bisphenol A food contamination offers protocol suggestions for conducting replicable, causal dietary intervention studies
  • Challenges of human nutrition research
  • Implausible discussions in saturated fat 'research; definitive solutions wont come from another million editorials (or a million views of one)
  • Food choices: concordance in Australian children aged 11-12 years and their parents
  • Circulating concentrations of micro-nutrients and risk of breast cancer: A Mendelian randomization study
  • Circulating selenium and prostate cancer risk: a Mendelian randomization analysis
  • PREDIMED trial of Mediterranean diet: retracted, republished, still trusted?
  • Food based dietary patterns and chronic disease prevention
  • Dietary guidelines and health--is nutrition science up to the task?
  • Perspective: Improving Nutritional Guidelines for Sustainable Health Policies: Current Status and Perspectives
  • Systematic review of the association between dietary acid load, alkaline water and cancer
  • Worldwide Exposures to Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Associated Health Effects: Current Knowledge and Data Gaps
  • We need more randomized trials in nutrition--preferably large, long-term, and with negative results
  • Perspective: Randomized Controlled Trials Are Not a Panacea for Diet-Related Research
  • Nutrition science in the media: you are what you read
  • The Challenge of Reproducibility and Accuracy in Nutrition Research: Resources and Pitfalls
  • Precision Oncology Framework for Investigation of Exercise As Treatment for Cancer
  • Addressing Current Criticism Regarding the Value of Self-Report Dietary Data
  • Reply to E Archer and SN Blair
  • Understanding Nutritional Epidemiology and Its Role in Policy
  • Are some diets "mass murder"?
  • Considering the Value of Dietary Assessment Data in Informing Nutrition-Related Health Policy
  • Causal link between vitamin D deficiency and ill health still possible
  • Authors' reply to Boucher
Back to top