Letters Updated version of QRISK2 Authors’ reply to Bird BMJ 2012; 345 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e5885 (Published 10 September 2012) Cite this as: BMJ 2012;345:e5885 Article Related content Metrics Responses Peer review Related articles Letter Being sanguine about study design and multiple imputation Published: 10 September 2012; BMJ 345 doi:10.1136/bmj.e5884 Research Methods & Reporting Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls Published: 29 June 2009; BMJ 338 doi:10.1136/bmj.b2393 Research An independent external validation and evaluation of QRISK cardiovascular risk prediction: a prospective open cohort study Published: 07 July 2009; BMJ 339 doi:10.1136/bmj.b2584 Research Predicting the 10 year risk of cardiovascular disease in the United Kingdom: independent and external validation of an updated version of QRISK2 Published: 21 June 2012; BMJ 344 doi:10.1136/bmj.e4181 Research An independent and external validation of QRISK2 cardiovascular disease risk score: a prospective open cohort study Published: 13 May 2010; BMJ 340 doi:10.1136/bmj.c2442 See more Evidence review ordered by government backs minimum alcohol pricing BMJ December 05, 2016, 355 i6546; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6546 Woman denied abortion in Ireland is offered €30 000 compensation BMJ December 05, 2016, 355 i6530; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6530 Communicating risk to patients in the emergency department BMJ December 05, 2016, 355 i6437; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6437 The future of NHS dentistry in Scotland BMJ December 05, 2016, 355 i6466; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6466 The Association of Cancer Physicians responds to “Cancer drugs, survival, and ethics” BMJ December 05, 2016, 355 i6487; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6487
