Letters Comparing risk prediction models Systematic review did not consider problem of treatment effects BMJ 2012; 345 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e4355 (Published 03 July 2012) Cite this as: BMJ 2012;345:e4355 Article Related content Metrics Responses Peer review Related articles Letter QRISK may be less useful Published: 01 September 2009; BMJ 339 doi:10.1136/bmj.b3485 Research Comparisons of established risk prediction models for cardiovascular disease: systematic review Published: 24 May 2012; BMJ 344 doi:10.1136/bmj.e3318 See more Patients with asthma or heart disease should avoid incense sticks and other airborne pollutants, says CMO BMJ June 03, 2025, 389 r1146; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.r1146 Why are UK cardiovascular deaths in under 65s rising again? BMJ May 19, 2025, 389 r1015; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.r1015 Prescribing parkrun: medicalising a walk in the park BMJ April 08, 2025, 389 r670; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.r670 GPs can prescribe tirzepatide to priority patient groups from June BMJ April 02, 2025, 389 r665; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.r665 Exercise referral rates for patients with risk of cardiovascular disease vary widely across England, study reports BMJ February 12, 2025, 388 r287; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.r287
