Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users
to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response
is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual
response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the
browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published
online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed.
Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles.
The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being
wilfully misrepresented as published articles or when it is brought to our
attention that a response spreads misinformation.
From March 2022, the word limit for rapid responses will be 600 words not
including references and author details. We will no longer post responses
that exceed this limit.
The word limit for letters selected from posted responses remains 300 words.
Spence is right to criticize the profusion of diagnostic labels in psychiatry. Psychiatry is becoming a laughing stock in the media and within the medical profession because of its medicalisation of everyday complaints. There is no point in laying the blame at the hands of the drug companies -- psychiatrists are to blame not only for the swelling ranks of the somewhat dubious classification systems but also for the multitude of 'therapies' that follow. Diagnostic categories should be reduced to a few major catagories only.
There are diagnoses --clinical depression is not the same as being 'fed up', and hypomania is more than being 'overenthusiastic'. Besides, patients suffer from these serious conditions and seek help. But spare me from 'shyness disorder', 'anger disorder' and the like (the list is endless). Often successful individuals have 'labels' yet no person would describe them as ill (narcissistic rock star, obsessional cardiologist). Time to set the record straight and demolish the labels and the psychobabble.
Re: Mental illness does exist
Spence is right to criticize the profusion of diagnostic labels in psychiatry. Psychiatry is becoming a laughing stock in the media and within the medical profession because of its medicalisation of everyday complaints. There is no point in laying the blame at the hands of the drug companies -- psychiatrists are to blame not only for the swelling ranks of the somewhat dubious classification systems but also for the multitude of 'therapies' that follow. Diagnostic categories should be reduced to a few major catagories only.
There are diagnoses --clinical depression is not the same as being 'fed up', and hypomania is more than being 'overenthusiastic'. Besides, patients suffer from these serious conditions and seek help. But spare me from 'shyness disorder', 'anger disorder' and the like (the list is endless). Often successful individuals have 'labels' yet no person would describe them as ill (narcissistic rock star, obsessional cardiologist). Time to set the record straight and demolish the labels and the psychobabble.
Competing interests: No competing interests