Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users
to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response
is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual
response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the
browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published
online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed.
Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles.
The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being
wilfully misrepresented as published articles or when it is brought to our
attention that a response spreads misinformation.
From March 2022, the word limit for rapid responses will be 600 words not
including references and author details. We will no longer post responses
that exceed this limit.
The word limit for letters selected from posted responses remains 300 words.
Since the average cost of a UK funeral is almost 3000 pounds
currently and predicted to rise to over 4000 pounds by 2017 (1), it is
difficult to reconcile making such a comparatively large payment for the
funeral of a deceased donor whose expressed written consent prior to
death, exposes her or him to no personal risk , when at the same time,
HEFA is proposing just 750 pounds be paid to living egg donors (2), who
are exposed to a degree of risk - albeit small.
Other questions also remained unanswered such as how to ensure that
such funeral payments are used for their intended purpose or the
disincentive they might be to younger living donors who are not eligible
for the scheme and even if they were, could they be sure the scheme will
not be withdrawn before their own death at an increasingly likely old age
of over 100?
It is not only the Nuffield Council's mutually contradictory views on
relatives' veto of donors' wishes (3) that require considerably more
thought.
Costs vs risks in organ and egg donation
Since the average cost of a UK funeral is almost 3000 pounds
currently and predicted to rise to over 4000 pounds by 2017 (1), it is
difficult to reconcile making such a comparatively large payment for the
funeral of a deceased donor whose expressed written consent prior to
death, exposes her or him to no personal risk , when at the same time,
HEFA is proposing just 750 pounds be paid to living egg donors (2), who
are exposed to a degree of risk - albeit small.
Other questions also remained unanswered such as how to ensure that
such funeral payments are used for their intended purpose or the
disincentive they might be to younger living donors who are not eligible
for the scheme and even if they were, could they be sure the scheme will
not be withdrawn before their own death at an increasingly likely old age
of over 100?
It is not only the Nuffield Council's mutually contradictory views on
relatives' veto of donors' wishes (3) that require considerably more
thought.
1. Mintel data from http://www.co-operative.coop/funeralcare/Funeral-
Plans/content/what-are-funeral-plans/
2. Dyer C BMJ 2011 343 867
3. Strong CW, Shafer T BMJ 2011 343 860
Competing interests: No competing interests