How useful are laboratory tests in diagnosing serious infections in febrile children?
BMJ 2011; 342 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d2782 (Published 08 June 2011) Cite this as: BMJ 2011;342:d2782- Stephen C Aronoff, Waldo E Nelson professor and chairman
- 1Department of Pediatrics, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA
- aronoff{at}temple.edu
Evaluating acute febrile illnesses in infants and young children is one of the most challenging diagnostic problems in primary care medicine. Most of these children have self limiting viral illnesses that will resolve quickly without medical intervention; serious bacterial infections occur rarely. In one large study of 15 781 febrile illnesses in children under 5 years, only 7.2% were found to have a serious bacterial infection.1 The search for a strategy to differentiate those children with serious bacterial infections from those with self limiting viral illnesses at the time of clinical presentation has met with limited success. In the linked systematic review (doi:10.1136/bmj.d3082), Van den Bruel and colleagues assess the diagnostic value of laboratory tests for the diagnosis of serious infections in children in ambulatory settings.2
Clinical guidelines for the management of febrile infants and toddlers up to 36 months of age …
Log in
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £184 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£50 / $60/ €56 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.