Head To Head Is open peer review the fairest system? No BMJ 2010; 341 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c6425 (Published 16 November 2010) Cite this as: BMJ 2010;341:c6425 Article Related content Metrics Responses Peer review Related articles Head To Head Is open peer review the fairest system? Yes Published: 16 November 2010; BMJ 341 doi:10.1136/bmj.c6424 Research Effect on peer review of telling reviewers that their signed reviews might be posted on the web: randomised controlled trial Published: 16 November 2010; BMJ 341 doi:10.1136/bmj.c5729 Paper Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial Published: 02 January 1999; BMJ 318 doi:10.1136/bmj.318.7175.23 Editor's Choice Stop exploiting orphan drugs Published: 18 November 2010; BMJ 341 doi:10.1136/bmj.c6587 Editorial Prepublication histories and open peer review at The BMJ Published: 03 September 2014; BMJ 349 doi:10.1136/bmj.g5394 See more Constitutional symptoms in a young person BMJ December 07, 2016, 355 i5781; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5781 The BMJ Christmas appeal 2016-7: Orbis, the sight savers BMJ December 01, 2016, 355 i6425; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6425 EU to launch new antimicrobial resistance action plan BMJ November 23, 2016, 355 i6328; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6328 A typical sign on a plain knee radiograph BMJ November 23, 2016, 355 i6021; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6021 An older man with thoracic back pain BMJ November 23, 2016, 355 i5786; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5786 Cited by... Peer review: acknowledging its value and recognising the reviewersFulltext PDF Prepublication histories and open peer review at The BMJFulltext PDF
