Intended for healthcare professionals

  1. Research
  2. Ten steps towards...
  3. Ten steps towards improving prognosis research
Research Methods & Reporting

Ten steps towards improving prognosis research

BMJ 2009; 339 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b4184 (Published 31 December 2009) Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b4184

Related articles

See more

Cited by...

  • Symptoms and signs in patients with heart failure: association with 3-month hospitalisation and mortality
  • Multi-modal digital pathology for colorectal cancer diagnosis by high-plex immunofluorescence imaging and traditional histology of the same tissue section
  • Nuclear Medicine and Artificial Intelligence: Best Practices for Evaluation (the RELAINCE Guidelines)
  • Exploratory analyses in aetiologic research and considerations for assessment of credibility: mini-review of literature
  • The prognostic value of cardiopulmonary exercise testing in interstitial lung disease: a systematic review
  • Summarising and synthesising regression coefficients through systematic review and meta-analysis for improving hypertension prediction using metamodelling: protocol
  • Assessment and comparison of the max-ICH score and ICH score by external validation
  • A systematic review of epigenetic biomarkers in progression from non-dysplastic Barretts oesophagus to oesophageal adenocarcinoma
  • Diagnostic prediction models for suspected pulmonary embolism: systematic review and independent external validation in primary care
  • Use of GRADE for assessment of evidence about prognosis: rating confidence in estimates of event rates in broad categories of patients
  • Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD Statement
  • Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement
  • Prognosis research strategy (PROGRESS) 1: A framework for researching clinical outcomes
  • The Risky Business of Studying Prognosis
  • Translational phases of evidence in a prognostic biomarker: a systematic review and meta-analysis of natriuretic peptides and the prognosis of stable coronary disease
  • Clinical decision making in spinal fusion for chronic low back pain. Results of a nationwide survey among spine surgeons
  • Development of a risk score to guide brain imaging in older patients admitted with falls and confusion
  • Prevention of false positive findings in observational studies: registration will not work but replication might
  • The prognosis of motor neurone disease
  • An independent and external validation of QRISK2 cardiovascular disease risk score: a prospective open cohort study
  • Strength of association between umbilical cord pH and perinatal and long term outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Publications shouldn't be key to advancement
  • Registration of observational studies
  • The prognosis for research
  • Assessing the cost effectiveness of using prognostic biomarkers with decision models: case study in prioritising patients waiting for coronary artery surgery
Back to top