What’s the difference between a hospital and a bottling factory?
BMJ 2009; 339 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2727 (Published 20 July 2009) Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b2727
All rapid responses
Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed. Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles. The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being wilfully misrepresented as published articles or when it is brought to our attention that a response spreads misinformation.
From March 2022, the word limit for rapid responses will be 600 words not including references and author details. We will no longer post responses that exceed this limit.
The word limit for letters selected from posted responses remains 300 words.
Morton and Cornwell describe a comparison of hospital services with a
bottling factory, and highlight the floors in management tools with
relation to the unpredictability of patient response.1 Most patients who
walk into a GP or Hospital referral are there to establish a diagnosis
(like abdominal pain, blurred vision) which makes some of the lean
management and six sigma tools difficult to utilise as it needs the
intuitive nature of a clinicians to establish it. However, there are a
significant number of things that we do in primary care and secondary care
that have clear process and implementing these tools can add substantial
value to the process (like cataract surgery, hernia repair) as they are
more precise and predictable. The patient pathway from presentation to
diagnosis is complex, requiring multiple different primary and secondary
care organizations, medical staff and resources. Although it is true that
a patient’s response is unpredictable, there are many complex steps
involved in the patient pathway; the appointment booking, waiting time,
medical note availability, time to investigations and treatment. The
complex pathway and processes required to deliver healthcare services are
frequently a source of frustration to both patients and clinicians.2 It is
the unpredictable nature and inconsistency of these processes that
highlights the need for a systematic and effective solution. Unnecessary
delays, misplaced information and breakdown in hospital processes are
continually highlighted in measures of the patient experience. Efficiency
is often used in the context of cost-saving, however it is also inherent
to the quality of services. Management tools such as lean thinking3 and
six sigma offer a proven opportunity to improve inconsistencies in current
practise and offer long-term solutions to real improvements in quality of
care. Understandably critics are right when they say “patients are not
bottles”, however healthcare is a highly complex organization with a
myriad of complex processes, and management tools offer us a framework to
improve patient’s quality of care.
1. Morton A, Cornwell J. What's the difference between a hospital and
a bottling factory. BMJ 2009;339:428-29.
2. Gainsbury S. Missing: the notes of more than a million outpatients.
Health Service Journal 2008 (http://www.hsj.co.uk/missing-the-notes-of-
more-than-a-million-outpatients/1388893.article):[Accessed 22nd August
2009].
3. Kim CS, Spahlinger DA, Kin JM, Billi JE. Lean health care: what can
hospitals learn from a world-class automaker? J Hosp Med 2006;1(3):191-9.
Competing interests:
None declared
Competing interests: No competing interests
"...intensive interdisciplinarity required in much clinical work,
which may involve not just medicine but nursing, anaesthetics,
physiotherapy, clinical psychology, and the legions of other
professionals, paraprofessionals, and non-professionals who staff the
modern hospital."
I don't normally get bothered when patients assume that I am not a
doctor. My professional status is irrelevant to patients; what matters is
the care I provide. My peers usually know that I have a medical degree,
and if not then I do get some satisfaction from being the one who gets
called when things are looking really dodgy. So I probably shouldn't get
upset that lecturers in operational research or directors of health
service delivery programmes do not appear to know anaesthetists are
medically trained either.
Is this just the old chip on anaesthetic shoulders that I need to shut up
and deal with? Or does it matter that the non-clinical management people
with influence over health service structure and function do not seem to
understand how the NHS fits together?
Competing interests:
I am an anaesthetist
Competing interests: No competing interests
Variability is normal - clinically
Editor
Every patient is unique - physically, psychologically and socially.
Every healthcare professional is unique - in knowledge, experience and
aptitude. Every presentation of illness or injury is unique. Every
response to every intervention is unique. All factors interact uniquely
and often unpredictably. That makes every combination of clinical events
within healthcare, at a minimum, unique cubed and maybe unique to the
fifth or sixth power.
Variability is not a problem in such a setting, it is normality. Its
attempted elimination is a fool's errand. There are housekeeping
functions, such as getting the professional, the patient and all necessary
notes/data/equipment to the same place at the same time which can be
systematised to a degree. Hotel services, lab processes, logistics,
secretarial services likewise.
The autonomous clinician is not the problem but rather the solution.
The problems in modernising healthcare lie with the political and
managerial cadre. It is their relentlessly perverse obsession with
centralisation, managerialism, contractualism, the proletarianisation of
all the professions and the building of facts and policy around arbitrary
political postures or transient theoretical models that repeatedly betrays
us all.
Yours sincerely
Steve Ford
Competing interests:
None declared
Competing interests: No competing interests