Editorials Where are we in the rationing debate? BMJ 2008; 337 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a2047 (Published 10 October 2008) Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a2047 Article Related content Metrics Responses Peer review Related articles Analysis Accountability for reasonableness: an update Published: 09 October 2008; BMJ 337 doi:10.1136/bmj.a1850 Analysis Moving forward on rationing: an economic view Published: 09 October 2008; BMJ 337 doi:10.1136/bmj.a1872 Analysis Clinical priority setting Published: 09 October 2008; BMJ 337 doi:10.1136/bmj.a1846 Editor's Choice It’s the evidence, stupid Published: 16 October 2008; BMJ 337 doi:10.1136/bmj.a2119 Letter Priority setting needs strong leadership Published: 03 November 2008; BMJ 337 doi:10.1136/bmj.a2386 See more Evidence review ordered by government backs minimum alcohol pricing BMJ December 05, 2016, 355 i6546; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6546 Woman denied abortion in Ireland is offered €30 000 compensation BMJ December 05, 2016, 355 i6530; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6530 Communicating risk to patients in the emergency department BMJ December 05, 2016, 355 i6437; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6437 The future of NHS dentistry in Scotland BMJ December 05, 2016, 355 i6466; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6466 The Association of Cancer Physicians responds to “Cancer drugs, survival, and ethics” BMJ December 05, 2016, 355 i6487; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6487 Cited by... Priority setting needs strong leadershipFulltext
